A clear view of where AI fits.
Understand optional AI suggestions and AI-assisted editorial guides on Onact, their limits, data inputs and why people should review outputs.
Optional builder suggestions
The administrator may enable an external AI provider to suggest an action type, title, description and choices from the description you enter. Manual creation remains available. The current feature does not analyze uploaded images or independently inspect a linked product.
Do not include confidential or sensitive information in a suggestion prompt. Where the provider is enabled, the entered description is sent to it under the operator’s configured account and the provider’s terms. The operator must name its active provider and processing details in the privacy notice.
Editorial assistance
The bundled article library was developed with AI assistance. It is not represented as human-written or professionally certified. Worked examples are illustrative and do not describe real customers. Source links support further checking; they do not imply endorsement of Onact.
Review before relying on a result
Suggestions can be incomplete or wrong. Read the choices, check dates and amounts, and remove unnecessary personal information before sharing. AI output cannot bypass the server’s validation. Do not use the journal as legal, financial or medical advice.
See privacy details, our editorial approach, and send a correction.
Two separate kinds of assistance
The local help assistant retrieves source text from permitted published help, managed public pages, journal content and current plan settings. Matching happens in the browser without sending the question to an external AI service. It cites its sources and should decline questions with no reliable match. It cannot inspect private accounts, orders, actions or delivery logs.
Optional provider-AI generation in the builder is a separate feature controlled by the operator. When configured, it sends the submitted idea to the provider to suggest an action draft. It uses a finite plan allowance and site budget. Do not include personal, confidential or regulated information in that prompt, and review the resulting type, title and options before sharing.
Local receipt recognition
Receipt capture uses bundled Tesseract browser code and an English recognition model. It does not require an external OCR account. The server validates accepted images and enforces capture credits; optional retained copies are encrypted temporarily outside public media. Recognition confidence is an estimate, not verification that the receipt or its amounts are authentic.
Users must review extracted names, prices, currency, tax and tip before applying items to the bill builder. The parser can miss rows or confuse a total with another amount. Manual entry remains available. Publishing a reviewed bill creates separate action content, so deleting a temporary receipt does not remove that bill automatically.
Editorial transparency
The starter journal and help library are AI-assisted drafts. Unique files, metadata and lexical checks do not prove human authorship, expert review, factual completeness or search ranking. An editor should inspect source support, examples, product details and legal wording before publication. No platform score or generated paragraph is a guarantee of semantic originality.
The operator can edit, remove or schedule content through WordPress and protect local changes during safe refresh. If a guide is inaccurate, report its URL and the specific claim needing correction. Keep current evidence separate from hypothetical teaching examples, and do not present a source citation as endorsement by the referenced organization.
Your next useful step
Read the product guides · Compare current plans · Contact Onact